Analysis of a Passionate Ted Talk

Ted Talk: https://www.ted.com/talks/isabelle_allende_how_to_live_passionately_ no_matter_your_  age

This ted talk that I chose to watch and analyze was by a woman named Isabel Allende, and she argues that everyone should continue to live passionately throughout life, no matter what their age is.  She focuses on age right off the bat, by stating that she is 71, and then lists the ages of her husband, parents, and dog.  On the topic of aging, she discusses how society seems to determine that people are "old" around the age of 65.  However, humans start aging at birth and then are continuously aging until death.  Isabel mentions that it is hard aging, because no matter if she feels sexy and charming, that's not how people view her anymore on the outside.  To counter that, she says that aging is about health and attitude.  It's up to the person to choose how to feel.  Furthermore, she speaks of her fear of what comes with aging.  She discusses how she fears losing her youth and independence as she grows older, but has experienced some pros as well.  She gained freedom, spirituality, and is no longer afraid of being vulnerable.  She feels freer and lighter than ever before, and can now let go of any weaknesses or deadly sins that others exhibit at younger ages.  Ending her argument, Isabel once again emphasizes her want to live passionately and openhearted throughout all of her life.

I think her purpose for doing this ted talk was to achieve an emotional connection to everyone in the audience.  Aging is a universal concept that everyone can understand.  The way she talks about the topic makes it interesting and inspiring.  She’s hoping to communicate the importance of everyone living the lives to the fullest, even in old age.  Aging is not a valid reason to stop living the life the way one wants.  It’s a choice that one needs to make, and her emotional connection persuades viewers to take her advice and continue living passionately despite growing older.

Her talk contains some ethos due to Isabel's credibility as a novelist and memoirist.  Because of her career, she is used to writing about passionate lives.  She believes she became a writer due to her exile to America in the 1970s.  She also works with nonprofits to empower women because she believes it’s the only way to achieve social justice.  Her career is not explicitly stated during her talk, but it does explain how she is able to be comfortable with her words and knowing exactly what to say to persuade someone to her side while doing so on an emotional level.  She has spent her life writing with passion, which makes her seem experienced and trustworthy to the viewers. 

Although Isabel does not use much logos in her presentation, she uses pathos throughout all of it.  The evidence is from her own personal experiences and contains a lot of bias.  Viewers can tell she truly believes in every word she is saying, and it's like some of her strength and confidence is even drawing forth some of the viewers' own emotions.  She relies on it to get her message across emotionally to really relate with the audience.  One way she does this is by making jokes throughout her talk.  It keeps things interesting and fun, maintaining the audience's attention.  Also, the part when she speaks of all the positive aspects she has gained from aging is very powerful.  I like it, because she makes it sound like the pros outweigh the cons, and makes the concept of aging less scary.  The way she holds herself makes her seem truthful, comfortable with herself, and relatable.  Her use of pathos creates a personal connection between Isabel and the audience, which makes her argument that much more inspiring/appealing.      

Personally, I found myself choosing this video because I think the concept of aging is really interesting.  Everyone experiences it differently.  I'm at this point when I'm about to graduate high school and go to college.  I just turned 18, making me an adult now.  It’s such a major point in life that it can bring on both pros and cons as well.  There’s the pro of being done with high school and finally getting to the point when we can start our futures, and what we might want to do as a career.  There’s also the fear that it brings, like the amount of responsibility it requires.  Unlike Isabelle, we are actually gaining independence, and to me it’s both scary and exciting.  I think her talk really can relate to what I’m experiencing at this point in my life, and I will always remember her main message of always living passionately.  She concluded her talk with her stating her willingness to always live passionately and asking the question, "Want to join me?"  My answer is Yes.               


  
 

Double Indemnity

Film noir literally means “black film.” As you are watching the film, keep track of all the elements in the picture that seem dark or depressing. Think about the characters, the setting, and the storyline.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51yNWpAzy8L.jpg

The film Double Indemnity is the perfect example of film noir.  After watching it in my film class, I have learned many common aspects included in film noir.  Most of them are seen in the storyline of Walter Neff and Phyllis Dietrichson.  The term began with French film critics and described the darkness expressed in many films after the war to represent the anxiety and pessimism in society.  Everything about the films seemed dark, including the characters, the setting, and the story.  

First, the characters are seen as very dark and corruptive.  The film focuses on Walter and Phyllis, who both exemplify the dark characteristics of men and women in film noir.  Walter does not appear to be such a bad guy at the beginning of the movie.  He rather appears confident in his actions and with his relationship with Phyllis.  He comes off as a man who has seen it all, which is common in film noir in the male characters.  However, he grows darker as the film progresses due to Phyllis' influence.  He is shown as being weak as he is easily put into danger with Phyllis by his side.  He gets caught up in her plan to murder her husband, making him more evil as he kills a man he barely even knows just because of a woman.  Phyllis is also a very dark character, because she is the one who set all of the events into motion in the first place.  In film noir, there is usually a fatal female who comes across as powerful, sexual, smart, and threatening.  Throughout the story, she is able to convince Walter to help her kill her husband so she can receive the money.  She does it in a very sneaky way, and tells Walter how horrible her husband really is.  Then the audience learns that Phyllis might have been behind another woman's death too.  It all comes together at the end when she is holding the gun at Walter, and it is revealed she never really loved him at all.  This makes her appear very evil for how the murder was all a scheme concocted by Phyllis from the very beginning.  She is amoral and manipulative, only caring about herself.

The setting was also very dark, with helped emphasize the depressing themes seen in the film.  With the help of cinematic techniques, the film appeared dark and shadowy in almost every scene.  The dark themes of murder and corruption were displayed with the use of dark lighting and deep shadows, which are common in film noir.  The settings in Double Indemnity included darkly lit, small rooms, and gloomy, shadowy streets at night.  One interesting insight on the movie was that the film was shot on location.  It was shot in real cities in Los Angeles to better reflect on reality at the time.  Concepts like venetian blinds, low key lighting, and deep shadows are used to alter space psychologically and display dramatic isolation.  All of these aspects add to the suspense and darkness portrayed in Double Indemnity.  

Finally, the storyline was overall dark and depressing.  The film focuses on murder and crime, and deal with corruption, evil, guilt, manipulation, etc.  Due to these dark themes, the film had to deal with censorship.  The government did not like seeing criminals simply walking around freely, which is exactly what Walter and Phyllis were doing after committing murder.  Because of censorship, film noir films tended to be more psychological in that they forced the audience to think.  In Double Indemnity, conversations about adultery and murder were very discrete.  One example is when Walter first speaks with Phyllis and their flirting turns into spoken words of speed limits.  It was left to the viewers to fully decipher what the characters actually meant.  Also, the love story is dark.  It can be described as passionate and deadly.  They plan a murder together, and it turns out there was no love between Walter and Phyllis after all.  There was only manipulation and corruption between the two of them, clearly shown when the two of them are willing to shoot each other at the end.  To add to the depressing themes, there was no happy or optimistic ending.  Both characters reached their ultimate downfall.  Overall, film noir aims to show the darker sides of human nature, and Double Indemnity does just that with its characters, setting, and storyline.