Sunday, November 16, 2014

Becoming Evil: Macbeth Edition



http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327866505l/8852.jpg
There have been plenty of stories about a great person suddenly becoming evil after one fateful decision.  Sometimes it is a quick, hasty choice the character does not think twice about and then has to deal with the consequences.  Other times, it is a choice that the protagonist spends time about, weighing the pros and cons, and ultimately chooses what they think is right, but what the audience knows is wrong.  That is what happens in Shakespeare’s story of Macbeth.  The character Macbeth is overall a great man that is honored by everyone else.  Even the king admires him for his loyalty and courage.  Towards the beginning of the play, the king Duncan calls Macbeth, “O valiant cousin, worthy gentleman!” (Macbeth, 1.2).  The admiration was returned.  Macbeth saw himself as the king’s warrior and his friend.  So what made him kill Duncan? Why did a seemingly not evil man take the first step into evil?
There are various reasons one can be led to evil acts.  I think a very common reason is temptation.  If the temptation is too much, the person will be willing to do anything to get what they want.  Wanting something so badly can lead to dangerous acts.  In the play, Macbeth is too tempted to be king that he gives up his innocence when he murders Duncan.  I think it was the witches’ prophecy that tempted him into the action.  They declared that Macbeth would become the thane of Cawdor and king.  When the previous thane of Cawdor was executed and he took his place, he believed the witches.  However, he believed the only way he could become king was to kill Duncan.  In my opinion, it wasn’t fate that led him to this decision.  I think he was still able to make his own choices and that the title of king was something he consciously always wanted.  Therefore, Macbeth was overwhelmed by his desire to consider the consequences killing the king might bring.
Despite his temptation, he was also hesitant about committing the murder.  That’s why I think the other reason a person turns to evil is the influence of others.  Someone can be pushed into something they don’t want to do by another person.  It’s even harder to resist when the act may be something he/she is already considering.  Another person’s advice could be the thing that pushes the decision over the edge and into action.  In Macbeth, Lady Macbeth is the one that pretty much forces Macbeth into killing Duncan.  When he is hesitant, his wife treats him like he’s foolish for not completely be committed to the crime.  She convinces him it’s the right decision, and is able to persuade him into doing it.  Her push led Macbeth to killing his previous friend Duncan so that he can achieve the power he desires so much.
Much of the consequences for causing Duncan’s death are internal.  Talking about the crime beforehand and actually committing it are two very different things.  The aftermath of an evil act can cause negative effects to a previously good person.  They are unexpected and can take control of someone.  The guilt and regret can instantly rise up.  An internal conflict can come about whether the decision was worth it or was it a waste and simply the wrong thing to have done.  These consequences are portrayed through Macbeth after his wrongful deed.  He starts to go a bit crazy.  His mind won't allow him to stop thinking about what he has done.  He becomes frantic and restless, not being able to go to sleep.  He says, "Macbeth shall sleep no more" (Macbeth, 2.2). 
 
Overall, he has trouble accepting what he did.  Simple things like saying "Amen" are even a struggle.  He cries, "I had most need of blessing, and "Amen" stuck in my throat" (Macbeth, 2.2).  Taking steps towards evil can really affect a person and their behavior.  He/she must deal with the consequences.  In the play, Macbeth's innocence disappears and evil only builds up leading him to commit more evil acts, like forcing Banquo's death, to protect his new found power.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

5 comments:

  1. Aloha, Kaitlyn!
    Overall, I think the way you presented your argument was great. You showed language and you showed how "fate" does not exist by the use of outside forces. I liked how you connected the temptation to the desire to the committing part, which help shows that it's the person's choices that affect the future; thus, the evidence was justified correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good/Great/Invigorating/Intriguing post; You can choose an adjective. I think you did a good job of explaining why a person takes their first steps to evil. Question for you, that you are not obligated to answer; If Lady Macbeth hadn't influenced Macbeth at all, do you think that Macbeth wouldn't have murdered Duncan?

    ReplyDelete
  4. LOVE how you thoroughly examined Macbeth's characters and actions in your response to this question.

    ReplyDelete
  5. YO KColuch, First off, i very much enjoyed this post. It was extremely concise and well written and communicated your ideas well. It got me thinking though, why should you have to be known as a twin? You truly DESERVE more than a shared, lesser title such as "twin". Someone as intelligent as you? you could easily be the oldest sibling, the head of the colucci totem, the heir to the colucci throne. Why should someone of your intellectual and powerful stature have to be considered equal to that Ape-like baffoon of a "fraternal-Twin". Think about it, it would be easy. You know this is what youve always wanted, look into your heart you know it to be true.
    (cackles into dark corner)

    (Disclaimer: ANy opinions expressed by the author of this comment are simply parodies to demonstrate the concepts found in the above text. This comment is simply a parody and therefore not to be taken seriously. Any actions taken by the the OP of the above text, are not to be linked to this parody comment)

    ReplyDelete